In which I follow up a previous post, ask the ICO what action he is taking and consider the implications for ICO funding under proposed amendment of data protectionlaws
In a previous post I pointed out that 22 MPs who had been identified in October 2011 as not having registered with the Information Commissioner (ICO) were still showing as not being registered. As I said, failure to register in circumstances where there should be a registration constitutes a criminal offence under section 21 of the Data Protection Act 1998. The blog post got some interest, so I thought I should follow it up with this request to the ICO under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. The request can be seen on the excellent whatdotheyknow.com but I thought it would be useful to post a copy here:
Dear Information Commissioner’s Office
In October last year you disclosed to another requester a list of
46 MPs who had not renewed their section 18 DPA registration with
your office. You explained some of the procedure for enforcing the
statutory requirement to register, and explained that
“Prosecution is usually the last resort when all else fails and we
do give ample opportunity for the data controller to register. The
legal team are not currently considering any MPs for prosecution.”
It appears, from a check of your register that, currently, 22 of
those same MPs have still not registered, more than seven months
later. These are
NIGEL EVANS MP
EDWARD LEIGH MP
KHALID MAHMOOD MP
JAMES CLAPPISON MP
ANGUS ROBERTSON MP
PAT DOHERTY MP MLA
RACHEL REEVES MP
SHAILESH VARA MP
CHRISTOPHER CHOPE MP
ERIC JOYCE MP
ZAC GOLDSMITH MP
I note that in several instances these MPs appear not to have
renewed their notification for over a year.
Please inform me, under the Freedom of Information Act 2000
1. What enforcement action has been taken against these MPs?
2. How many reminders each has been given (I understand you
normally operate a two-reminder, then enforcement, system)
3. In addition to these 22, how many other MPs have not renewed
their notification? (as more than seven months have elapsed I
presume there will be some additional notifications which have
I acknowledge that the online register does not guarantee to be
As my previous post said, enforcement of this provision of the DPA does not appear to have stopped: I have seen no announcement to suggest this, and it would be odd, to say the least, if the ICO decided to turn a blind eye to one of the clear offences in the DPA. What would make it particularly odd is the fact that registration represents a huge revenue stream for the ICO, and the more data controllers who register, the greater the income. A fee is levied against a data controller when they register, which amounts to either £35 or £500, depending on the size of the organisation. The last set of accounts show that the income to the ICO from this stream was just short of £15 million.
Clearly it is in the ICO’s interest to enforce this requirement. A failure to enforce, or a perceived failure to enforce could lead to data controllers deciding it’s worth taking a risk by not registering, to save an annual £35 or £500 (they know they would get at least two reminders as it is).
Finally, I note that under amendments to the statutory scheme which will follow the enactment of a new European data protection Regulation, this requirement to register will probably be removed. I presume someone has thought about the effect this will have on the funding of the ICO? £15 million is a hell of a lot to lose, and, the office is underfunded as it is.
2 responses to “MPs and Data Protection offences, part two.”
Pingback: MPs and Data Protection Offences, part etc etc | inforightsandwrongs
Pingback: Applicant blind? | Walshipedia